The old Jewish Cemetery; Venice, 1790. 

Goethe loosens the earth from the skull, and holds it up to the sun. 

Turning the fractured bone back and forth, he gasps.  A series of marks appear inside the cavity, reminding him of the vertebrae.  He has looked at this pattern many times, but without seeing what lights up before him today. 

Here is the shadow of a blueprint; the ‘primal repeating units’ of animal bodies, from which their many variations form. 

Puzzled, Götze watches his master’s eyes shine with delight. 

---

Watch this baby babbling; her limbs move, often in time with her sounds.  the coupling of gestures and vocal calls are widespread amongst social vertebrates.  And the story began with fish.

The rhythm of our breath keeps us alive.  Conscious muscle movements are made through spinal nerve reflexes, but like our heart beats, the repeating sequences of muscle actions which fill and empty our lungs are outside our conscious awareness.

The movements behind repetitive activities like breathing are driven by rhythmic nerve impulses from ‘neural oscillators’.  These pattern-generating circuits, located in the central nervous system, are known as ‘Central Pattern Generators’.

To breathe, to speak and to swallow we use the same internal tube; that is our throat (the pharynx).  These activities are necessarily exclusive; consider what happens when a crumb ‘goes down the wrong way’.  Speech therefore needs to be coordinated with our breathing.

We make vocal sounds by passing air through the larynx as we breathe out, at the same time as vibrating our vocal folds (vocal cords).  These actions involve coordinating a sequence of repetitive movements inside the throat with the repeating muscle actions that drive our breath.

Communicating with sound evolved long before animals emerged from the sea onto land and began to breathe air.  Many fish use pectoral fin movements as communication gestures; some also generate sounds by fin waving.

In species of vocal fish, the calls are coordinated with these pectoral fin signals.  Significantly, the muscles operating these social communication cues are controlled using the same neural oscillator ‘module’.

‘Central Pattern Generators’ are neural oscillators that generate a rhythmic output, used to control repeating muscle movements.  These ‘neural metronomes’ were first discovered in insects, and produce their steady pulse without any sensory stimulus.  In contrast, our other nerves operate on a ‘stimulus-response’ basis.

 

Central Pattern Generators reveal what can be called our ‘deep homology’.  First discovered in insects, all vertebrates, including ourselves, have these ancient neural circuits.  They links vocal calls with gestures, and coordinate our ‘fins’ with our speech.

How do Central Pattern Generators work? 

We consciously control our limbs through spinal nerve reflex arcs.  In contrast, rhythmic movements controlling oscillating cycles are driven by Central Pattern Generators (CPGs).  These autonomous modules in the central nervous system produce a rhythmic output (like a neural ‘black box’).  CPG modules are comprised of a dense interconnected local network of neurons; a neural ‘node’.

These nodes are organised into three levels, each with a different function, and in each case, the parts of the circuit ‘higher’ in this organisation regulate the outputs of those below.

In the developing embryo there are functional units, ‘segments’ which give rise to our vertebrae and their associated nerves and muscles.  The nerves from each of these ‘segments’ form our local sensory spinal reflexes and also the CPG modules.  As needed, higher brain centres trigger these ‘neural motors’ to produce their rhythmical nerve impulses and drive all of our rhythmical movements from walking to chewing.

CPGs controlling rhythmic movements of the tongue, throat and breathing (including the vocal neural oscillator module) are in the lower brainstem and neck.  The CPGs that drive the rhythm of our walking are low down in the spinal cord, in the thoracic and lumbar regions.

Why don’t we sound like fish? 

Toadfish vocalise with either a sequence of repetitive grunts during aggressive encounters or the prolonged drone of their mating call.  In both cases, each nerve impulse from the vocal pattern generator produces a single synchronised contraction in their sonic muscles; this muscle pair flexes the rigid walls of the swimbladder, producing a ‘grunt’.  This sound receives no further processing.  As a result, its tone is rather mechanical.

Our voice, like that of frogs, birds and mammals, also begins with this simple rhythmic sound pulse.  This initial sound is then processed into croaks, calls songs and speech.  Our neck  allows us to create resonant areas in the throat which amplify certain frequencies.  Pitch is affected by vocal fold (vocal cord) tension, and manipulation of our tongue and lips produces precisely articulated words.

Why is ‘talking with our hands’ still a part of our language?

Many vocal fish make synchronised gestures with their front (pectoral) fins during mating calls.  These motor nerve connections from our ancient common ancestor are retained in other vertebrates.

People blind from birth move their hands when they talk.  Our vocal Pattern Generator circuits connects with both our larynx and pectoral muscles, coordinating our speech with our ‘body language’.  We subconsciously move our hands as we communicate thanks to these rhythmic central circuits.  As in all other vertebrates, we have inherited these from (as Palaeontologist Neil Shubin puts it) our ancestral ‘inner fish’.

Text copyright © 2015 Mags Leighton. All rights reserved.

References

Aboitiz, F. (2012)  Gestures, vocalizations, and memory in language origins.  Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience 4, e2.

Bass, A.H. and Chagnaud, B.P. (2012)  Shared developmental and evolutionary origins for neural basis of vocal-acoustic and pectoral-gestural signalling.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109 (Suppl.1), 10677-10684.

Bass, A.H. et al. (2008)  Evolutionary origins for social vocalization in a vertebrate hindbrain-spinal compartment.  Science 321, 417-421.

Bostwick, K.S. (2000) Display behaviors, mechanical sounds, and evolutionary relationships of the Club-winged Manakin (Machaeropterus deliciosus). Auk 117, 465-478.

Bostwick, K.S. et al. (2010)  Resonating feathers produce courtship song. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B 277, 835-841.

Chagnaud, B.P. et al. (2012)  Innovations in motoneuron synchrony drive rapid temporal modulations in vertebrate acoustic signalling.   Journal of Neurophysiology 107, 3528-3542.

Dick, A.S. et al. (2012)  Gesture in the developing brain.  Developmental Science 15, 165–180.

Ghazanfar, A.A. (2013) Multisensory vocal communication in primates and the evolution of rhythmic speech. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67, 1441-1448.

Goethe, J.W. (1820).  Zur Naturwissenschaften überhaupt, besonders zur Morphologie; cited (p. 7) in G.R. de Beer The Development of the Vertebrate Skull.  Clarendon (1937).

Guthrie, S. (1996)  Patterning the hindbrain.  Current Opinion in Neurobiology 6,41-48.

Hanneman, E. et al. (1988) Segmental pattern of development of the hindbrain and spinal cord of the zebrafish embryo. Development 103, 49-58.

Iverson, J.M. and Thelen, E. (1999)  Hand, mouth and brain: The dynamic emergence of speech and gesture.  Journal of Consciousness Studies 6, 19-40.

Kelley, D.B. and Bass, A.H. (2010)  Neurobiology of vocal communication: mechanisms for sensorimotor integration and vocal patterning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 20,748-53.

Marder, E. and Bucher, D. (2001)  Central pattern generators and the control of rhythmic movements.  Current Biology 11, R986-R996.

Shubin, N (2008)  Your inner fish; a journey into the 3.5 Billion year history of the human body.  Penguin Books Ltd.

Shubin, N. et al. (2009)  Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty.  Nature 457, 818-823.

‘It’s head is as long as I am tall!’

       ‘What is it?’

‘Hmm…  A giant fish?  A lizard?  Don’t know.’

       ‘Well I know!  It’s a sea dragon!’ 

It is spring, 1811, the morning after a storm.  Mary is 12 years old, and fearless.  She edges across the cliff to where her brother is already working to free the fossil bones.  Fragments of weathered mudstone clatter down onto the beach.  The eye sockets of the huge skull are wider than the span of her hand.

---

During the 200 million years that dinosaurs roamed the land, the oceans were ruled by formerly land-dwelling reptiles.  Of these, ichthyosaurs adopted dolphin-like forms, plesiosaurs became sea lion-like, and mosasaurs occupied crocodile-like ‘ambush’ predator roles.

Of these, ichthyosaurs were arguably the most successful.  Their multiple adaptations to a fully aquatic life included huge eyes, a stiffened, fluked tail, and the ability to mate and give birth to live young in water.  Much as killer whales do today, these predators structured the marine ecosystem.  Many came to resemble the modern whales, dolphins and tuna fish that now fulfil similar ecological roles.  The convergence of body forms between some ichthyosaur species and tuna are particularly astonishing because these reptiles were air breathers.

Why did icthyosaurs evolve to look like modern marine animals?

Life in water poses a specific set of challenges.  These marine reptiles fulfilled similar ecological roles  to whales, and in time evolved body forms similar to these modern mammals.  This is known as convergence.

Like whales and tuna, ichthyosaurs were adapted for long distance energy-efficient swimming.  The respective horizontal and vertical strokes of both ichthyosaur and dolphin tails give an equally powerful ‘lift’ in both directions, propelling these animals forward in a near straight line.

A further example of this convergence is seen in the modern otter.  Unlike the Ichthyosaurs, both whales and otters had land-based mammalian ancestors with a vertically moving spine, giving them their bounding gait.  The whale-like ichthyosaurs moved their tail flukes horizontally, like a modern lizard.

Like whales and tuna, ichthyosaurs were adapted for long distance energy-efficient swimming.  The respective horizontal and vertical strokes of both ichthyosaur and  , propelling these animals forward in a near straight line.

What can modern animals tell us about ichthyosaurs?

Modern tuna and lamnid sharks have converged into a similar ‘deep water sprint-predator’ ecological role.  These long distance migrants move constantly at a moderate speed, except for short fast bursts when chasing prey.  Chunky vertebrae stiffen their bodies at their core, reducing sideways movements except at the narrow ‘hinge’ before the tail.  The continuously active red ‘cruising’ muscles either side of the spine are warm, in marked contrast to most other fish.  In combination with large tendons, these muscles work like pulleys, flicking the fluked tail from side to side. The surrounding white muscles give extra power during short ‘sprints’.

The ichthyosaur Stenopterygius was tuna-shaped with chunky stacked vertebrae.  This stiffened body form suggests that these reptiles converged on the cruise-and-sprint deep water hunting role of modern tuna and lamnids.

Did ichthyosaurs have warm muscles like whales and tuna?

The isotopic proportion between the heavy ¹⁸O and the light ¹⁶O oxygen (the ratio is given as d¹⁸O) in the bones of living fish and marine animals decreases as body temperature increases.  In principle we can use cold-blooded fish fossils as a ‘thermometer’ to indicate the water temperature, and compare this against isotope-predicted body temperatures for other fossil animals from the same rocks.

Oxygen isotope data allows us to infer that Jurassic plesiosaurs and ichthyosaurs had body temperatures of around 35⁰C, much higher than that of their environment.  This indicates that they could generate heat, and may well regulated their body temperatures independently of their environment (homeothermy).  Modern warm bodied marine animals have to conserve their body heat.  This means it is reasonable to infer that ichthyosaurs used similar methods such as a counter-current blood circulation  system and/or heat-insulating blubber.

What happened to the ichthyosaurs?

Ichthyosaurs dominated the world’s oceans for around 150 million years, but then disappeared from the fossil record after the mid-Cretaceous (around 95Ma).  The cause of their sudden extinction remains a mystery.  The empty ecological roles that this created were later filled by mosasaurs; relatives of modern monitor lizards including the Komodo dragon.  In turn these reptiles died out during the Cretaceous-Tertiary mass extinction (65Ma), making way for the later evolution of modern whales, dolphins and tuna.

Text copyright © 2015 Mags Leighton. All rights reserved.

References

Benson, R.B.J. and Butler, R.J. (2011)  Uncovering the diversification history of marine tetrapods: ecology influences the effect of geological sampling biases In Comparing the Geological and Fossil Records: Implications for Biodiversity Studies ( A.J. McGowan and A.B.Smith, eds).  Geological Society of London Special Publications 358, 191-208.

Bernal, D. et al. (2005)  Mammal-like muscles power swimming in a cold-water shark.  Nature 437: 1349-1352.

Brill, R.W. (1996)  Selective advantages conferred by the high performance physiology of tunas, billfishes and dolphin fish.  Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, A 113, 3-15.

Brill, R.W. et al.(2005)  Bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) behavior and physiology and their relevance to stock assessments and fishery biology.  Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT 57, 142-161.  Online;http://www.iccat.es/en/pubs_CVSP.htm

Dickson, K.A. and Graham, J.B. (2004)  Evolution and consequences of endothermy in fishes.  Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 77, 998-1018.

Donley, J.M. (2004)  Convergent evolution in mechanical design of lamnid sharks and tuna.  Nature 429, 61-65.

Fröbisch, N.B. et al. (2013)  Macropredatory ichthyosaur from the middle Triassic and the origin of modern trophic networks.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 110, 1393-1397.

Graham, J.B. and Dickson, K.A. (2004)  Tuna comparative physiology. Journal of Experimental Biology 297, 4015-4024.

Houssaye, A. (2013)  Bone histology of aquatic reptiles: what does it tell us about secondary adaptation to an aquatic life?  Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 108, 3-21.

Korsmeyer, K.E. et al. (1996)  The aerobic capacity of tunas; adaptation for multiple metabolic demands.  Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, A 113, 17-24.

Lindgren, J. et al. (2007) A fishy mosasaur: the axial skeleton of Plotosaurus (Reptilia, Squamata) reassessed. Lethaia 40,153–160.

Lindgren, J. et al. (2011)  Landlubbers to leviathans: evolution of swimming in mosasaurine mosasaurs.  Paleobiology 37, 445-469.

Lingham-Soliar, T. and Plodowski, G. (2007) Taphonomic evidence for high-speed adapted fins in thunniform ichthyosaurs. Naturwissenschaften 94, 65-70.

Malte, H. et al. (2007) Differential heating and cooling rates in bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus Lowe); a model of non-steady heat exchange. Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2618-2626.

Motani, R. et al. (1998) Ichthyosaurian relationships illuminated by new primitive skeletons from Japan.  Nature 393, 255-257.

Motani, R. (2002) Scaling effects in caudal fin propulsion and the speed of ichthyosaurs. Nature 415, 309-312.

Motani, R. (2002) Swimming speed estimation of extinct marine reptiles: energetic approach revisited. Palaeobiology 28, 251-262.

Motani, R. (2010) Warm-blooded “Sea Dragons”? Science 328, 1361-1362.

Rothschild, B. M. et al. (2012)  Adaptations for marine habitat and the effect of Triassic and Jurassic predator pressure on development of decompression syndrome in ichthyosaurs.  Naturwissenschaften 99, 443-448.

Syme, D.A. and Shadwick, R.E. (2011)  Red muscle function in stiff bodied swimmers: there and almost back again.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 366, 1507-1515.

Thewissen, J.G.M. and Bajpai, S. (2009)  New skeletal material of Andrewsiphius and Kutchicetus, two Eocene cetaceans from India.   Journal of Paleontology 83, 635-663.